Re: Parentage off Henry Denton away from Maryland

Re: Wingfield Applications-of-Fingers

The Tickencote visualize appears to time from no less than 1650 according so you can page 3of Particular Suggestions of your Wingfield Relatives by the Wingfield, John Meters.London: Murray, 1925 republished because of the Wingfield Relatives Neighborhood in the 1991. ISBN0-nine37543-03-9.

“Sir Robert Wyngfeld out-of Letheringham, their [Sir Robert just who d. ily out-of six otherwise seven sons and you may fivedaughters, and is regarding him, together with youngsters and grandchildren,which played no small-part on the factors of world of England, that thepresent really works [Wingfield’s publication] food.

His eldest young buck is actually Sir John Wyngfeld out-of Letheringham, Knight, exactly who, having hiswife, means the 2 main figures regarding dated pedigree oils images whichprovide the main topic of these details.

There are two main of these oictures available, almost identically the same, oneat Tickencote Hall, Rutland, and the other at the Boughton Domestic, Northants. Itis as yet not known which is the original and you may the backup.

This couples was encircled regarding best and bottom files by each of their 16 people, within the for each case Wingfield household (1) Bosville and (2) every quarter, Goushell while the chequy finish

The only from the Tickncote, now belonging to Lieut.-Col. John MauriceWingfield, are coated towards the canvas, features most likely already been through it since the about1650, because it’s probably this was actually the property of your own last SirRobert Wingfield of Upton, into the Northamptonshire, that is believed to provides diedduring the new commonwealth, and several out-of whoever oils paintings was in the thattime removed so you’re able to his cousin’s home on Tickencote, when Upton was sold, andwhich will always be there.”

Mcdougal claims one “the image in Boughton house can easily be tracedback to 1677” (web page cuatro) and offer several comments regarding the middle 1700srefering so you’re able to way of the photo and its particular presentation towards Duke ofMontague.

The writer states on the webpage six one to “Whenever, otherwise by whose acquisition, otherwise by the just who they waspainted, continues to be a question unsure by positives.”

Once more, my personal questions towards the group heart perhaps not within the genealogicalconnections from the players, (the brand new Wingfields was indeed explored fairlywell, and you will even after my typo towards Howard family unit members, I really do have the pedigreeaccurately annotated within RI) but towards reason of which protects weredisplayed because of the latter two generations. I think You will find a sense of just what”should” get on this new respective protects, and you can in the morning curious as to the reasons, in cases like this,that doesn’t seem to be what exactly is found. Often I’m misleading into the myunderstanding, or perhaps the Wingfield’s have been to play pretty prompt and you will reduce withtheir fingers for the majority of goal and that we could possibly not yet understand.

Kelly, thank you for delivering me images, and you may using Tim for protecting myself the situation of putting them online. Appearing that it more than along with the pedigrees within the Viscount Powerscourt’s _Muniments of Ancient Saxon Family of Wingfield_, the business is obvious if you ask me; what’s more, it seems that there is you to definitely glaring heraldic mistake, right in the middle, perhaps the way to obtain their dilemma. I can recognize We haven’t twice-checked the youngsters’ impalings and i also have one other unanswered question (what is the coroneted lozenge in the all the way down register?). The red lines appear to superimposed about this image regarding the book are not particularly of use, and annotated ‘key’ cannot in fact replicate what captions and you may doesn’t explain men whoever hands are shown.

There have been two fascinating points to the image recommending a couple other focuses. Basic, it is targeted on a 15th-century wedding and you may suggests the children of that wedding, however, zero later material. Second, they suggests a guarantee part with lineage right down to the 17th century.

The new main panel is the wedding of Sir John Wingfield (d. 1481) so you’re able to E, dau. out of Sir John Fitz Lewis and you will Anne (Montacute). The 2 numbers kneel in the centre, and are surmounted from the impalings of the parents’ palms in wreaths. The fresh new heraldic mistake will be here, as the Sir John’s dad’s completion both quarters and you may impales Gousell (in reality, Gousell quartered with this chequy finish). It is an error. It’s noticeable your quartering out-of Gousell and the chequy finish is available in at that time, so it can’t be both quartered and you may impaled throughout the wreath (unless of course, from the implication, Sir John whom d. 1481 had pulled a keen Oedipus and you can partnered their own mother). Something I don’t recognize is the coroneted lozenge hanging over the students about lower register.


Author: Team Hoppingo